<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Erlang + Yaws vs. Ruby on Rails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yarivsblog.com/articles/2006/07/11/erlang-yaws-vs-ruby-on-rails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yarivsblog.com/articles/2006/07/11/erlang-yaws-vs-ruby-on-rails/</link>
	<description>Adventures in Open Source Erlang</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pedz</title>
		<link>http://yarivsblog.com/articles/2006/07/11/erlang-yaws-vs-ruby-on-rails/#comment-174284</link>
		<dc:creator>pedz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 01:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-174284</guid>
		<description>Have you looked at the JavascriptMCV framework?  The Controller, View, Model are (kinda) in the user's browser.  This makes the web site more and more just a data store and it puts as much work as possible in the user's browser (distributed out to the client) rather than on the server.

I've not used it yet but it seems, over time, this will be the way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you looked at the JavascriptMCV framework?  The Controller, View, Model are (kinda) in the user&#8217;s browser.  This makes the web site more and more just a data store and it puts as much work as possible in the user&#8217;s browser (distributed out to the client) rather than on the server.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not used it yet but it seems, over time, this will be the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://yarivsblog.com/articles/2006/07/11/erlang-yaws-vs-ruby-on-rails/#comment-159462</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 19:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159462</guid>
		<description>Yariv, why do you think that mixing HTML and code in ehtml is a good idea? It goes very much against the MVC paradigm. Plus, do you really want to tell me that you like escaping HTML attribute values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yariv, why do you think that mixing HTML and code in ehtml is a good idea? It goes very much against the MVC paradigm. Plus, do you really want to tell me that you like escaping HTML attribute values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yariv</title>
		<link>http://yarivsblog.com/articles/2006/07/11/erlang-yaws-vs-ruby-on-rails/#comment-87915</link>
		<dc:creator>Yariv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-87915</guid>
		<description>I think using Mnesia with Rails is like going to a fancy restaurant and ordering a cheeseburger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think using Mnesia with Rails is like going to a fancy restaurant and ordering a cheeseburger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: José Manuel Peña</title>
		<link>http://yarivsblog.com/articles/2006/07/11/erlang-yaws-vs-ruby-on-rails/#comment-86589</link>
		<dc:creator>José Manuel Peña</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-86589</guid>
		<description>Hey Yariv! What if you mix up erlang Mnesia database with ruby on rails thorugh an MQ server as rabbitmq?

You're not going to take advantage of YAWLS server, but at least you can still using Mnesia. However, this means that you have to do your application asyncrounous friendly.

I think this solution is as scalable as flexible. Gaining all RubyOnRails features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Yariv! What if you mix up erlang Mnesia database with ruby on rails thorugh an MQ server as rabbitmq?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re not going to take advantage of YAWLS server, but at least you can still using Mnesia. However, this means that you have to do your application asyncrounous friendly.</p>
<p>I think this solution is as scalable as flexible. Gaining all RubyOnRails features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://yarivsblog.com/articles/2006/07/11/erlang-yaws-vs-ruby-on-rails/#comment-33531</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-33531</guid>
		<description>missing from the discussion is how to configure lighttpd so that it can send requests to yaws... much the way fcgi or scgi would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>missing from the discussion is how to configure lighttpd so that it can send requests to yaws&#8230; much the way fcgi or scgi would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat Schaffer</title>
		<link>http://yarivsblog.com/articles/2006/07/11/erlang-yaws-vs-ruby-on-rails/#comment-17961</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat Schaffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17961</guid>
		<description>You might want to add a link for 'configure Yaws to serve your applicationâ€™s directory'.  You're the top hit if I google for 'Yaws configure' :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to add a link for &#8216;configure Yaws to serve your applicationâ€™s directory&#8217;.  You&#8217;re the top hit if I google for &#8216;Yaws configure&#8217; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a-nonymzen</title>
		<link>http://yarivsblog.com/articles/2006/07/11/erlang-yaws-vs-ruby-on-rails/#comment-9078</link>
		<dc:creator>a-nonymzen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 14:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9078</guid>
		<description>There was a question from Demius regarding yaws and oracle. wouldn't it be possible to use odbc? I spotted this url: http://erlang.org/doc/doc-5.5/lib/odbc-2.0.6/doc/html/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a question from Demius regarding yaws and oracle. wouldn&#8217;t it be possible to use odbc? I spotted this url: <a href="http://erlang.org/doc/doc-5.5/lib/odbc-2.0.6/doc/html/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://erlang.org/doc/doc-5.5/lib/odbc-2.0.6/doc/html/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albertlee</title>
		<link>http://yarivsblog.com/articles/2006/07/11/erlang-yaws-vs-ruby-on-rails/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>albertlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 03:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-387</guid>
		<description>sounds great</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yariv</title>
		<link>http://yarivsblog.com/articles/2006/07/11/erlang-yaws-vs-ruby-on-rails/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Yariv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Hi Dennis,

I'm pretty sure Mnesia could handle 3.2GB without too much difficulty. I haven't deployed large scale backends with Mnesia, though, so I can't be sure. I suggest you ask on the erlang-questions list.

Porting Ruby's Feedparser library into Erlang shouldn't be too hard :)

Yariv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dennis,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure Mnesia could handle 3.2GB without too much difficulty. I haven&#8217;t deployed large scale backends with Mnesia, though, so I can&#8217;t be sure. I suggest you ask on the erlang-questions list.</p>
<p>Porting Ruby&#8217;s Feedparser library into Erlang shouldn&#8217;t be too hard :)</p>
<p>Yariv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis</title>
		<link>http://yarivsblog.com/articles/2006/07/11/erlang-yaws-vs-ruby-on-rails/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Regarding mnesia scaling...if you were to cluster servers, would it scale up nicely with that 3.2GB per server? If so, it might not be bad for a web-based discussion forum...Now if only there were an RSS/Atom library...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding mnesia scaling&#8230;if you were to cluster servers, would it scale up nicely with that 3.2GB per server? If so, it might not be bad for a web-based discussion forum&#8230;Now if only there were an RSS/Atom library&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
